JILLA PRATHMIK SHIKSHAKSUNGH ELECTION YOJVA BABAT PARIPATRA
under 74th EWAmendment and that local bodies discharge this responsibility
as an agent of State Government and are therefore entitled to full
reimbursement of expenditure.
- PARIPATRA PDF FILE DOWNLOAD KARVA NICHE SCROLL KRO
Education Department, Government of Gujarat by its GR dated 31-3-2010
(Annex-A)
(Annex-A)
constituted a Committee to re draft the Gujarat ( Bombay )Primary
Education Act, 1947 and Gujarat Compulsory Primary Education Act,
1961 in the context of, and in consonance with The Right of Children
to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RtE Act) enacted by
Government of India. The GR also mandated the Committee to draft
rules and suggest procedure to give effect to provisions of admission of
disadvantaged children and recognition of unaided schools in the RtE Act.
Education Act, 1947 and Gujarat Compulsory Primary Education Act,
1961 in the context of, and in consonance with The Right of Children
to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RtE Act) enacted by
Government of India. The GR also mandated the Committee to draft
rules and suggest procedure to give effect to provisions of admission of
disadvantaged children and recognition of unaided schools in the RtE Act.
The Committee co-opted a few members and held several meetings.
It constituted three sub
It constituted three sub
groups to work on
(i) admission of disadvantaged children to unaided schools
(ii) recognition of unaided schools
(iii) Gujarat (Bombay ) Primary Education Rules 1949
The Committee held meetings with teachers, school managements and
association
association
representatives in Ahmedabad, Surat, Vadodara and Rajkot and greatly
benefited from their views.The Committee submitted draft of Gujarat
Elementary Education Act to State Government in August 2010. As requested
by the Education Department, the Committee submitted draft rules on the
admission of disadvantaged children and recognition of unaided schools in
July 2010. Draft of revisedGujarat Elementary Education Rules was submitted
in January 2011.The Committee examined many complex and controversial
issues associated with RtE Act. Thethinking of the Committee on some of
these issues is summarized in the following paragraphs as thiswill explain
the reasons for some of its recommendations:The RtE Act increases
Government control in elementary education and
benefited from their views.The Committee submitted draft of Gujarat
Elementary Education Act to State Government in August 2010. As requested
by the Education Department, the Committee submitted draft rules on the
admission of disadvantaged children and recognition of unaided schools in
July 2010. Draft of revisedGujarat Elementary Education Rules was submitted
in January 2011.The Committee examined many complex and controversial
issues associated with RtE Act. Thethinking of the Committee on some of
these issues is summarized in the following paragraphs as thiswill explain
the reasons for some of its recommendations:The RtE Act increases
Government control in elementary education and
this could result in administrative malpractices. The Committee felt that
there should be adequate checks and balances to reduce the opportunities
for misuse of authority, particularly in the context of requirement of all
unaided schools to obtain recognition. The Committee has recommended
that all applications for recognition should be examined not by Education
Department but by committees consisting of retired teachers and
Government officials, and educationists; and grant of recognition or
otherwise should be based on the report of these independent committees.
there should be adequate checks and balances to reduce the opportunities
for misuse of authority, particularly in the context of requirement of all
unaided schools to obtain recognition. The Committee has recommended
that all applications for recognition should be examined not by Education
Department but by committees consisting of retired teachers and
Government officials, and educationists; and grant of recognition or
otherwise should be based on the report of these independent committees.
6 The Committee has also recommended that the existing practice of
annual inspections by Education Inspectors should discontinue as it no l
onger serves any useful purpose. The Committee has recommended that
academic committees consisting of educationists should be given
responsibility of academic supervision and guidance of elementary
schools. The Committee has also recommended thatreputed schools
and other education institutions should also be associated in academic
supervision.
annual inspections by Education Inspectors should discontinue as it no l
onger serves any useful purpose. The Committee has recommended that
academic committees consisting of educationists should be given
responsibility of academic supervision and guidance of elementary
schools. The Committee has also recommended thatreputed schools
and other education institutions should also be associated in academic
supervision.
Every elementary school should have the benefit of such supervision at
least twice a year and the report of such supervision should be forwarded
to CRCs and DIETS for providing suitable training and other academic
assistance to teachers.
least twice a year and the report of such supervision should be forwarded
to CRCs and DIETS for providing suitable training and other academic
assistance to teachers.
7 The RtE Act puts enormous responsibility on local bodies for successful
implementation of free and compulsory elementary education to all children
within their jurisdiction. While District and Taluks Panchayats, and Municipal
Corporations in Gujarat are well equipped for this, most of the municipalities
are not. The Committee was informed that out of 165 Municipalities and
Municipal Corporations only
implementation of free and compulsory elementary education to all children
within their jurisdiction. While District and Taluks Panchayats, and Municipal
Corporations in Gujarat are well equipped for this, most of the municipalities
are not. The Committee was informed that out of 165 Municipalities and
Municipal Corporations only
19 are providing elementary education and such municipalities, are called ‘
authorized municipalities’. The remaining 146 have resolved that they are
not in a position to take this responsibility and the State Government has
therefore entrusted this responsibility to the concerned District Panchayat.
The Committee was informed that the main reason for the refusal of
unauthorized municipalities to manage elementary education was that
State Government provided only 95% of expenditure and the remaining5%
was to be borne by the local body. Since these municipalities did not have
financial resources, they opted not to provide this service. The Committee
was firmly of the view that ULBs cannot avoid this responsibility and
recommended that as in the case of District Panchayats, State Government
should fully reimburse to ULBs the expenditure on elementary education.
The Committee has also recommended that even though the financial
position of Municipal Corporations is stronger, this is nottheir core function
and they should also be provided full grants and not 85% as per the
present practice.
authorized municipalities’. The remaining 146 have resolved that they are
not in a position to take this responsibility and the State Government has
therefore entrusted this responsibility to the concerned District Panchayat.
The Committee was informed that the main reason for the refusal of
unauthorized municipalities to manage elementary education was that
State Government provided only 95% of expenditure and the remaining5%
was to be borne by the local body. Since these municipalities did not have
financial resources, they opted not to provide this service. The Committee
was firmly of the view that ULBs cannot avoid this responsibility and
recommended that as in the case of District Panchayats, State Government
should fully reimburse to ULBs the expenditure on elementary education.
The Committee has also recommended that even though the financial
position of Municipal Corporations is stronger, this is nottheir core function
and they should also be provided full grants and not 85% as per the
present practice.
JOIN US WHATSAPP CLICKHERE
LIKE US FACEBOOK CLICKHEREThe Committee was of the view that primary education is not covered
under 74th EWAmendment and that local bodies discharge this responsibility
as an agent of State Government and are therefore entitled to full
reimbursement of expenditure.
SCHOOL INSPECTOR RESULT
ALL DISTRICT CLICKHERE
AAJNA BIJA PARIPATRO JOVA CLICKHERE
IMPORTANT LINK ELECTION YOJAVA PARIPATRA
