PRAGYA NODH POTHI BY HARESHSIR
Below link download for pdf file for print
Education Department, Government of Gujarat by its GR dated 31-3-2010 (Annex-A)
constituted a Committee to re draft the Gujarat ( Bombay )Primary Education Act, 1947 and Gujarat
Compulsory Primary Education Act, 1961 in the context of, and in consonance with The Right of
Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RtE Act) enacted by Government of India. The
GR even mandated the Committee to draft rules and suggest procedure to give effect to provisions of
admission of disadvantaged kids and recognition of unaided schools in the RtE Act.
The Committee co-opted a some members and held many meetings. It constituted 3 sub
groups to work on
(i) admission of disadvantaged kids to unaided schools
(ii) recognition of unaided schools
(iii) Gujarat (Bombay ) Primary Education Rules year 1949
The Committee conducted meetings with teachers, school managements and association
representatives in Ahmedabad, Surat, Vadodara and Rajkot and greatly advantaged from their views.
The Committee submitted draft of Gujarat Elementary Education Act to State Government in
August 2010. As appealed by the Education Department, the Committee submitted draft rules on the
admission of disadvantaged kids and recognition of unaided schools in July 2010. Draft of revised
Gujarat Elementary Education Rules was submitted in January 2011.
The Committee examined several complex and controversial issues associated with RtE Act. The
thinking of the Committee on some of these problems is summarized in the following paragraphs as this
will explain the causes for some of its recommendations:
The RtE Act improves Government control in elementary education and this could result in administrative malpractices. The Committee felt that there should be sufficient checks and balances to reduce the opportunities for misuse of authority, specifically in the context of requirement of all unaided schools to obtain recognition. The Committee has recommended that all applications for recognition should be checked not by Education Department but by committees consisting of retired teachers and Government officials, and educationists; and grant of recognition or otherwise should be based on the report of these independent committees.
6 The Committee has even recommended that the existing practice of year inspections by Education Inspectors should discontinue as it no longer serves any helpful purpose. The Committee has recommended that academic committees consisting of educationists should be provided responsibility of academic supervision and guidance of elementary schools. The Committee has even recommended that reputed schools and other education institutions should even be associated in academic supervision.
Primary school inspector duties All elementary school should have the benefit of such supervision at least twice a year and the report of such supervision should be forwarded to CRCs and DIETS for giving suitable training and other academic assistance to teachers.
The RtE Act puts enormous responsibility on local bodies for successful execution of free and compulsory elementary education to all kids within their jurisdiction. While District and Talukas Panchayats, and Municipal Corporations in the Gujarat are well equipped for this, most of the municipalities are not. The Committee was informed that out of 165 Municipalities and Municipal Corporations only 19 are giving elementary education and such municipalities, are called ‘authorized municipalities’. The remaining 146 have resolved that they are not in a position to take this accountability and the State Government has therefore entrusted this responsibility to the concerned District Panchayat. The Committee was informed that the main causes for the refusal of unauthorized municipalities to manage elementary education was that State Government given only 95% of expenditure and the remaining 5% was to be borne by the local body. Since these municipalities did not have financial resources, they opted not to give this service. The Committee was firmly of the view that ULBs cannot ignore this responsibility and recommended that as in the case of District Panchayats, State Government should totally reimburse to ULBs the expenditure on elementary education. The Committee has even recommended that even though the financial position of Municipal Corporations is stronger, this is not their core function and they should even be given full grants and not 85% as per the present practice.
The Committee was of the view that primary education is not involved under 74th Amendment and that local bodies discharge this responsibility as an agent of State Government and are therefore entitled to full reimbursement of expenditure.thanks to Hareshsir
VITAL LINK:
